The enclosed mall at Hillsdale Shopping Center in San Mateo, Calif., had everything on a Friday morning: 1.3 million square feet of glistening space, top-drawer retailers like Nordstrom, reliable outlets like Macy’s, and teen-focused shops like American Eagle Outfitters.
It had everything except people.
The fabled mall — opened in 1954, enclosed in 1982 — felt like a ghost town. Or, in my frame of reference, like a big mainline Protestant church on a Sunday morning.
Still offering customary fare, still packed with amenities, just empty, no longer a popular destination. I didn’t see a single shopper in Sears. In the Macy’s jeans department, my destination, four staff waited on three customers. Several storefronts were empty.
It was eerie. I felt sorry for merchants paying steep rents and payrolls for foot traffic that wasn’t there. Will it get better after school? Maybe. But I just read that teenagers have moved on from mall stores. Even reliables like American Eagle Outfitters can’t draw them in for fashions that don’t update fast enough in a wired age.
Meanwhile, just up the peninsula south of San Francisco, the newly refurbished streets of Burlingame teemed with shoppers, many of them going in and out of stores exactly like those at Hillsdale.
None of this is new. Enclosed malls have been an endangered species for years. Strip malls are doing better, especially if they offer a downtown walkable feel. Online retail is doing best of all.
My point isn’t to decipher shopper psychology — even the experts can’t do that in real time — but rather that something fundamental has changed, and those grounded in the old are suffering.
It’s the same phenomenon we see in higher education, auto dealerships, country clubs and religion. The game changes — as games always do — and those stuck with overhead like large facilities, costly equipment, staffs configured for yesterday’s needs, dated technology, and faded product lines can’t change fast enough.
Proprietors of the old soon discover that, as wedded as they might be to the “historic” campus, newer constituents don’t share their devotion. At colleges they want an affordable education, not a link to 100 years of tradition. They want a swim team, not a pro-caliber golf course. They want to hear about God, not about a budget dominated by expenses for outsized facilities. They feel drawn to mission, not to heating bills and organ repairs.
Having tried hard in several churches to raise funds for legacy expenses, I know it’s a tough sell and getting tougher. And it should be a tough sell. Churches had no business building facilities they could barely afford to construct, not endowing them to cover ongoing expenses, and expecting future generations to be locked into their decisions.
This is especially true in situations where over-the-top grandeur fed the hubris of a certain group, and now that group and their deep pockets are gone.
The problem is that too many religious institutions have built their lives around maintaining legacy facilities. They haven’t built the community and shared mission that would enable them to abandon the Gothic pile and still have a reason for being. Take away their facilities and suddenly there isn’t anything binding them.
What should the folks who are guiding legacy institutions be doing? They should see that the game has changed and it might be over. Accept reality.
Then dig deeper for the real values they should be serving. Education, not football programs; discipleship, not stylish worship; selling a product, not clinging to real estate.
© 2016 Augsburg Fortress, Publishers